header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Open secrets

Claire Sanders reports on the sensitivities of disclosure in forced marriage cases

Two recent cases concerning forced marriage protection orders (FMPOs), both heard by Sir Nicholas Wall, the president of the Family Division, highlight some of the difficulties faced by the courts and the parties in forced marriage or “honour” based violence cases.

Under the Forced Marriage Protection (Civil Protection) Act 2007 (FM(CO)A 2007) circumstances may arise in which the disclosure of sensitive information is likely to lead to the risk of serious harm to the giver or source of the information.

Issues arise as to how the court can achieve a fair hearing that complies with the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), Art 6 if parts of the evidence necessary for parties to know in order to enable them to meet allegations made against them cannot safely be revealed to them on the ground that disclosure of the information or its source is likely to identify the informant and thus place them at risk.

The issue of disclosure may be particularly acute if the informant is another member of the family,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll