header-logo header-logo

13 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Ontrack with legal highs & lows

The Jackson effect, BYOD & dawn raids dominate legal trends

The risks of employees using their own smartphone for work, the Jackson “Big Bang” reforms, and a tough regulatory climate are some of the key trends of 2012 highlighted by this year’s Kroll Ontrack review.

The costs of civil litigation were in the spotlight this year, with senior judges voicing concerns about the high costs involved in bringing an action, the Jackson reforms, and the case of Sylvia Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 90218 (Costs), which found that lawyers are vulnerable if they don’t have a reliable method of monitoring adherence to budgets.

Concerns over how to protect company data where employees use their iPads, iPhones, smartphones and tablets (the “bring your own device” (BYOD) phenomenon) have been a big issue for companies this year, according to the review, which identifies the key legal trends of the year. A BYOD strategy is seen as essential for next year to protect corporate data, comply with data-protection laws and preserve electronic information in case of regulatory investigation.

“Dawn raid” training is becoming increasingly popular as companies find that regulatory investigations hit them out of the blue. The review also points out that regulatory changes in data-protection and competition law this year mean companies should continue to take a proactive approach to risk avoidance and compliance.

Martin Carey, managing director of legal technologies at Kroll Ontrack, says: “Court-led changes are underway which will have a significant effect on litigation in the UK, and legislative and structural changes will impact on regulatory enforcement activity across Europe. At the same time, new consumer-led technology is re-shaping the way in which business is conducted and all companies need to respond strategically.”

Issue: 7542 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll