header-logo header-logo

28 October 2021
Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-detail

Online wills storing up trouble?

Increased use of simple online wills could lead to a surge in unsuitable and contested wills, a funeral research and consultancy firm has predicted

In a report published last week, Funeral Solution Expert revealed its research, using nationally representative surveys among UK consumers, had uncovered ‘fundamental problems’, with wills too simplistic for many people’s circumstances. The will writers did not always ask sufficient questions to determine if a ‘simple’ will is suitable for an individual’s circumstances or provide clear warnings of the risks involved. Moreover, nearly a quarter (23%) of consumers did not read or understand the terms of the will they signed.

In particular, the report highlighted that online will writers are unregulated and offer little liability for anything going wrong, which means bereaved families would have nowhere to complain and no legal right to any compensation. 

Online wills have surged in the past year, fuelled by the pandemic.

Factors that could make a person’s affairs complex include marital status, children from previous relationships, assets held, business ownership and self-employment, overseas property and intention to disinherit a family member. However, the analysis found some will writers only asked three or four simple qualifying questions and did not check the customer’s mental capacity to make the will. This problem was exacerbated by the fact 65% of customers who claimed to have simple affairs actually had complex affairs.

Michael Culver, chair of Solicitors for the Elderly, said: ‘It’s shocking that while solicitors are required to have professional indemnity insurance covering claims potentially as high as £2m or £3m (and many firms go for optional additional cover that can take this as high as £10m per claim), other professionals offering wills limit their liability to the cost of the will. £200 compensation doesn’t seem sufficient to cover a mistake that could end up costing someone their entire estate or inheritance.’

Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Wills & Probate , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll