header-logo header-logo

14 August 2015
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Once is enough

If a litigant has not made at least two “totally devoid of merit” applications so that they are not susceptible to a civil restraint order, is the court nevertheless still empowered to debar a second application without its prior permission. I have an application to suspend a warrant of possession especially in mind?

The court is generally regarded as having the case management power to debar a second or successive application (see CPR 3.1(2) (m) and/or 3.1(3) (b)). This would impose a light touch procedural hurdle for the party where a restraint order is either unavailable or inappropriate. However, the reality of the situation is that litigants tend to disregard the hurdle and the court staff are unlikely to be unaware that it has been imposed when the next application is issued and listed. The restraint order which can be made where two applications have been dismissed as being totally devoid of merit is the more effective course.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll