header-logo header-logo

22 March 2019 / Cecily Crampin , Tricia Hemans
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

On the receiving end

Receivers & possession: Cecily Crampin & Tricia Hemans suggest looking past the agency device

  • Menon and Menon v Menon and Menon: can one sue oneself?

If tasked with running the argument that no man can sue himself, one might think oneself onto a winner. Surely it must be an irresistible submission that Mr and Mrs X could not possibly bring proceedings against Mr and Mrs X? However, when one factors in the Law of Property Act 1925, a mortgage and the appointment of receivers, one finds that such a submission may well get short shrift from the courts. This was the outcome of Menon and Menon (acting by Pask and Goode as joint fixed charge receivers) v Menon and Menon, 10 December 2018 (The County Court at Central London Unreported) where an argument that the Menons could not effectively sue themselves failed.

Typical

The case was typical of those involving receivers. The Menons were the registered proprietors of a west London property worth in the region of £5m. The Menons had charged the property as security

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll