header-logo header-logo

22 March 2019 / Cecily Crampin , Tricia Hemans
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

On the receiving end

Receivers & possession: Cecily Crampin & Tricia Hemans suggest looking past the agency device

  • Menon and Menon v Menon and Menon: can one sue oneself?

If tasked with running the argument that no man can sue himself, one might think oneself onto a winner. Surely it must be an irresistible submission that Mr and Mrs X could not possibly bring proceedings against Mr and Mrs X? However, when one factors in the Law of Property Act 1925, a mortgage and the appointment of receivers, one finds that such a submission may well get short shrift from the courts. This was the outcome of Menon and Menon (acting by Pask and Goode as joint fixed charge receivers) v Menon and Menon, 10 December 2018 (The County Court at Central London Unreported) where an argument that the Menons could not effectively sue themselves failed.

Typical

The case was typical of those involving receivers. The Menons were the registered proprietors of a west London property worth in the region of £5m. The Menons had charged the property as security

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll