header-logo header-logo

04 November 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7909 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

On parole & under review

30960
Jon Robins reports on the inevitable decision to review the Parole system

It was revealed last month that the Parole Board will be the subject of a ‘root and branch’ review potentially opening up hearings to victims of crime as well as members of the press (bit.ly/3mO6Jfn). Is this a win for advocates of open justice or a rather shabby knee jerk response of a government pandering to the baser instincts of the tabloid press?

Brian Lea of Nottingham didn’t need much persuading. ‘The stuffy, almost ignorant people on the Parole Board should have been put out to grass years ago,’ he wrote in the letters page of The Sun last week. ‘Let’s hope it’s not replaced by something even more stupid.’ It’s a bit harsh on the judges, psychologists, psychiatrists, probation officers as well as lay members who typically comprise parole boards.

Reform of the parole system has been inevitable since the furore over the initial decision to back the release of the so called ‘black-cab rapist’ John Worboys in 2018 convicted for attacks on 12 women. Police

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll