header-logo header-logo

09 August 2024 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8083 / Categories: Features , Sports law , Sports litigation , Copyright
printer mail-detail

Olympic-standard rights protection

185043
Not only the athletes but the lawyers should win a gold medal, writes Athelstane Aamodt

As nearly all NLJ readers will be aware, the Olympic Games were opened on 26 July. The Games in Paris are their 33rd iteration, in which 329 events in 32 sports have taken place. It is a global event par excellence.

The organisation (and indeed the cost) of the Olympics is on the most gigantic scale. The more interesting aspects of the Games are the intellectual property of the Olympic movement, the origins of it, and the zealousness with which those rights are protected.

The rings

The famous interlocking rings emblem of the Olympic Games was created in 1913 by Pierre de Coubertin (1863-1937), the co-founder of the International Olympic Committee (the IOC). It is a masterpiece of restrained simplicity, much like the Japanese national flag or the Mastercard logo. The five rings were intended to represent the five inhabited continents of the world, and the colours of those rings were intended to reproduce the colours contained in all the flags of the world at that time.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll