header-logo header-logo

Old colonies; new disputes

12 June 2015 / James Brockhurst
Issue: 7656 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Can the UK force its modern-day “colonies” to introduce registers of beneficial ownership, asks James Brockhurst

A bitter debate has been simmering between the UK and the British overseas territories regarding the proposed introduction of registers of beneficial ownership. The proposal is that each overseas territory should create a public register which will document the ‘real’ ownership of shareholders of every company registered within its borders. Although this article focuses on the legal position concerning the overseas territories, the matter is also relevant to the UK’s Crown dependencies.

This development will have wide-reaching practical implications for company, finance and private client lawyers in the UK and beyond.

The UK Parliament is legislating to introduce such registers in the UK under the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015. Alongside its own legislation, the UK is making rigorous demands that the overseas territories follow suit and introduce their own internal registers.

The UK government and its G8 partners believe that beneficial ownership registers will help combat cross-border tax avoidance and evasion. With this electorally popular objective in mind, the two largest UK political parties

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll