header-logo header-logo

11 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Official receiver—Status—Whether exercising judicial function

R (on the application of Howard) v Official Receiver [2013] EWHC 1839 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 73 (Jul)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (Manchester), Stadlen J, 28 June 2013

A decision by the official receiver revoking a debt relief order is one that is made in the exercise of a judicial function, and is therefore not subject to the public sector equality duty in s 149 of the Equality Act 2010.

Ben McCormack (instructed by Oldham Citizens Advice Bureau) for the claimant. Scott Redpath (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.

In May 2011, the claimant applied for and was granted a debt relief order (DRO). The claimant contended that she was a person with severe and long-standing health problems, which rendered her “disabled” for the purposes of s 6 of and Sch 1 to Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010). In December 2011, the defendant official receiver decided to revoke the DRO on the ground that the claimant’s declared income would materially exceed the threshold allowed for monthly surplus income. The claimant sought judicial review of that decision.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll