header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025 / Charles Davey
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Privacy , Disclosure , Health
printer mail-detail

Off the record

208117
Solicitors & courts are often indifferent to claimants’ rights to confidentiality, writes Charles Davey, setting out a blueprint for change to the disclosure rules
  • Trial bundles often include disclosure of the entirety of personal injury claimants’ medical records. In modest claims, this is unnecessary and inappropriate.
  • These records often relate to personal, sensitive and irrelevant details, and disclosure could be in breach of claimants’ right to privacy.
  • This article proposes that the Civil Procedure Rule Committee should provide a structure for disclosure in these claims.

In modest personal injury claims, routine, unnecessary and inappropriate disclosure of the entirety of claimants’ medical records is not acceptable. This is in clear violation of a solicitor’s duty of confidentiality and a potential breach of claimants’ rights under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, not to mention possible breaches of data protection legislation. To make matters worse, these records are frequently included in trial bundles.

In a claim for damages for life-changing injuries, with a substantial claim for loss of earnings or loss of earning capacity, or for injuries

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll