header-logo header-logo

13 June 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Automatic Enrolment) (Amendment) (No 2) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1477)

The Pensions Act 2008 introduced a duty on all employers to automatically enrol “jobholders” into a workplace pension scheme...

Commencement date

2 July 2012
 

Legislation Affected

SI 2010/772 amended

Summary

Background

The Pensions Act 2008 introduced a duty on all employers to automatically enrol “jobholders” into a workplace pension scheme. The Act defines a jobholder as an individual aged at least 16 and under 75, earning more than the lower limit of the qualifying earnings band and “who is working or ordinarily works in Great Britain under the worker’s contract”.

Under the Occupational Pension Schemes (Cross-border Activities) Regulations 2005, SI 2005/3381, a “qualifying person” is an employed person whose place of work is located in an EU member state other than the UK whose relationship with their employer is subject to the social and labour law of that other member state.

What’s Changing?

These Regulations exempt employers from automatically enrolling employees who are both “jobholders” and “qualifying persons”.

Why?

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll