header-logo header-logo

16 April 2015
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Obesity discrimination risk

Employers routinely discriminate against obese workers and are unaware of obesity and disability-related laws, research by a law firm has found.

In a survey of 1,000 employers with hiring responsibilities, by Crossland Employment Solicitors, nearly half were less inclined to recruit an obese applicant at interview. Employers described obese applicants as “lazy” and believed they would be unable to do the job.

Some 61% expressed concern about the potential cost of accommodating overweight staff, while 63% feared being taken to court on grounds of discrimination if they didn’t meet the obese person’s needs.

Employers also showed a lack of awareness of the law—more than half were unaware that obese applicants who tell them about their long term conditions at interview can then try to claim disability discrimination if they are not hired on the basis of their obesity.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently ruled that obesity may be a disability if it causes a long-term impairment, in the case of Karsten Kaltoft v Kommunernes Landsforerning C-354/13.

Beverley Sunderland, managing director at Crossland, says: “Our research shows just how less inclined employers are to recruit obese applicants following the case of Mr Kaltoft, the overweight childminder in Denmark and the ECJ ruling.

“It also demonstrates that organisations do need to be more careful at every stage of recruitment and retention of employees, as discrimination law warns us against making ‘stereotypical assumptions’ and doing so can lead to grievances and possible complaints of constructive dismissal.”

Issue: 7648 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll