header-logo header-logo

21 March 2014
Issue: 7599 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Nuisance

Keep Streets Live Campaign Ltd v London Borough of Camden [2014] All ER (D) 126 (Mar), [2014] EWHC 607 (Admin)

The Administrative Court dismissed the claimant’s application for judicial review of the defendant local authority’s decision to licence busking. The policy was sufficiently comprehensible and the totality of the evidence before the authority had entitled it to conclude that the requirements of s 33(2) of the London Local Authorities Act 2000 were complied with. The court applied established authority in holding that although the right to free expression under Art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights was engaged, it operated at a low level. The alternative measures available to the authority were not less restrictive and, certainly, were not equivalent to the powers under the 2000 Act for dealing in a comprehensive way with buskers. Accordingly, the authority had adopted a policy which was both necessary and a proportionate response to the issue of busking. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll