header-logo header-logo

26 April 2018
Issue: 7790 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Nothing simple about child support

The child support scheme is ‘Kafkaesque’ and in desperate need of simplification, a prominent family lawyer has warned.

Writing in NLJ this week, family law solicitor David Burrows says most parents are unrepresented, legal aid is rare and few lawyers deal with it, while ‘the majority of civil servants who operate the various branches of child support struggle with the meaning of swathes of the complex secondary legislation’.

Little, however, has been done to simplify the scheme. Another problem is that an individual parent has no legal right to sue for payment of arrears—only the Child Support Agency itself has the right to enforce arrears.

‘By any standards—especially of the single parents and children it is designed to help—the scheme’s success has been only very partial,’ says Burrows.

‘There are billions of pounds of child support maintenance in accumulated arrears, and no prospect of that being recovered.’

Issue: 7790 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll