header-logo header-logo

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Not so fast

If a fast track trial is adjourned on the day before evidence is adduced...

If a fast track trial is adjourned on the day before evidence is adduced and an order for the costs thrown away is made, is the receiving party entitled to the fixed trial fee for counsel? Also, if the claim later settles more than 28 days before the adjourned trial date, is the claimant entitled to the return of the hearing fee?

Assuming counsel is present with their brief, we consider that their client should have the fixed trial costs as or as part of the wasted costs which the paying party is condemned to bear. CPR 46.2 should not be interpreted as meaning that the trial must have taken place for the trial costs to be allowed. We do not consider that the hearing fee is returnable. The trial has been listed and court time lost. An adjournment would not trigger liability for a second hearing (or listing) fee: conversely, a settlement after an abortive hearing for which the court was not blame should not trigger an entitlement to the return of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll