header-logo header-logo

Limitation: Not just racing against the clock

257142
© Getty images
Laura Benghiat considers why litigators may need to revisit their limitation analysis as a case develops
  • Reviews key appellate decisions on limitation handed down in 2026, covering court fees, substitution, latent damage, fiduciary claims and the implications of delay where no statutory limitation period applies

Limitation can look deceptively tidy: identify the cause of action, calculate when the limitation period ends and issue in time. Job done. However, commercial disputes are rarely so orderly. Clients discover facts in stages, the correct defendant may not be obvious, corporate structures change, and claims evolve, sometimes over many years.

For litigators advising on long-running, complex disputes, this means limitation risks may emerge in ways that were not apparent when first instructed. If missed or mismanaged, the consequences can be severe.

In the first half of 2026, the appellate courts addressed a diverse range of limitation issues. Viewed together, these decisions reveal no overarching claimant- or defendant-friendly direction of travel, but they offer practical guidance and point to a common lesson for litigators: limitation should be treated not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll