header-logo header-logo

02 May 2013 / Anita Killeen
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Not guilty? Fat chance!

72919754_largefinal

Does body weight influence perceptions of responsibility, asks Anita Killeen

Researchers at Yale University have shown that a defendant’s body weight and gender can affect perceptions of guilt and responsibility. In addition the authors state that the prevalence of weight discrimination has increased worldwide by 66% since 1995 and is now on par with rates of racial discrimination.

Although “weight bias” has been documented across multiple domains, including employment, medical, and interpersonal settings, these findings  go further, highlighting the importance of increasing awareness to prevent such discrimination in legal settings. The research has relevance for all litigators, not just criminal law practitioners, as any trial where an obese client or witness is involved, such as defamation cases, health and safety cases, and employment cases, may be affected (see NA Schvey, RM Puhl, KA Levandoski and KD Brownwell, International Journal of Obesity (2013), 1:1-7).

A brief history of bias

Previous empirical research in both simulated and actual trial settings has indicated that bias does exist in the courtroom. For example, physically attractive defendants have been judged more leniently than less attractive counterparts, male defendants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll