header-logo header-logo

27 November 2015 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7678 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Nostalgia for nepotism

nlj_7678_backpage

Geoffrey Bindman QC reminisces on the days of the small family firm

Getting on to the legal ladder in the 1950s, when I first embarked on a career, was very much a matter of whom you knew or could get introduced to. Lawyers in the family could provide a place in a firm or chambers or a helpful introduction. I profited from both. When I aimed to go to the Bar a solicitor uncle arranged for me to have lunch with a leading junior who relied heavily on my uncle for his livelihood. He offered me pupillage on the spot. When I switched to the solicitors’ branch, my uncle offered me articles, at the then unsurprising salary of £3 a week. Only years later I found out that my father had paid my uncle a “premium” of £500, so in reality my employers were getting my services for nothing.

Family businesses

My story was not unusual. Many solicitors’ firms were family businesses, as some continue to be. So access to the profession had monetary value and paying for access made economic sense. Premiums disappeared

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll