header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No VAT on disbursements

VAT will not be applied to medical report costs in personal injury cases following a successful appeal against Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

Previously, fees paid to medical experts for reports and records were regarded as a disbursement and therefore free from VAT.

In 2008, HMRC changed its approach and raised an assessment on Nottingham law firm Barratt Goff & Tomlinson requiring VAT to be paid in respect of such fees. The firm successfully challenged HMRCs assessment.

Law Society president Linda Lee said the decision is a reminder that HMRC guidance is not necessarily an accurate reflection of the law.

“While HMRC have well-established guidelines on what may be treated as a disbursement for VAT purposes, its interpretation of those guidelines to require solicitors to account for VAT on items obtained as agent for their client...had caused confusion in the solicitors’ profession. 

“The approach taken by HMRC would have increased the costs of pursuing personal injury and clinical negligence cases. These increased costs would have been met by insurance companies, the NHS and the Legal Services Commission.”

Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll