header-logo header-logo

11 March 2026
Issue: 8153 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

No to interest plans, says CILEX

Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned

Responding to the Ministry of Justice consultation, ‘Interest on lawyers’ client accounts’, which closed this week, the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEX) said the proposals failed to stipulate how much might be raised, how it would be spent or what cost it would impose on law firms.

CILEX president Sara Fowler said the idea of using client money interest ‘has potential’ if ‘properly thought through’. However, ‘as it stands, we are being consulted on proposals that lack an underpinning evidence base,’ she said.

The Law Society and the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) have both robustly opposed the proposals.

Former APIL president John McQuater said some smaller firms ‘use any retained interest from client accounts to, for example, offset overdraft charges and provide funding models that are more beneficial to clients’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll