header-logo header-logo

29 September 2020
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

No to extended hours

Criminal lawyers have decisively rejected proposals for extended operating hours (EOH) in courts, which they warn would hinder childcare arrangements and damage their health

Longer hours are currently being trialled at seven Crown courts, with 9am-1pm and 2pm-6pm shifts, while some magistrates’ courts are sitting on Saturdays. However, HM Courts and Tribunals has plans to expand Saturday courts and introduce weekday evening 5pm-8pm sessions.

A Women in Criminal Law (WICL) survey to gauge practitioners’ views received 480 responses, 72% of whom were women, and more than 200 respondents’ barristers of seven years’ call or more (https://bit.ly/3kYUpI7).

An overwhelming 88% opposed EOH outright, with 4% in favour and 8% neutral. Reasons given included the impact on childcare or other caring arrangements (41%), impact on mental or physical health (13%) and impact on work-life balance (43%).

Some 192 respondents were primary caregivers, who would find it difficult or impossible to attend EOH courts. The WICL report concludes ‘the vast majority of criminal practitioners have no more hours left to give’.

Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll