header-logo header-logo

No to extended hours

29 September 2020
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Criminal lawyers have decisively rejected proposals for extended operating hours (EOH) in courts, which they warn would hinder childcare arrangements and damage their health

Longer hours are currently being trialled at seven Crown courts, with 9am-1pm and 2pm-6pm shifts, while some magistrates’ courts are sitting on Saturdays. However, HM Courts and Tribunals has plans to expand Saturday courts and introduce weekday evening 5pm-8pm sessions.

A Women in Criminal Law (WICL) survey to gauge practitioners’ views received 480 responses, 72% of whom were women, and more than 200 respondents’ barristers of seven years’ call or more (https://bit.ly/3kYUpI7).

An overwhelming 88% opposed EOH outright, with 4% in favour and 8% neutral. Reasons given included the impact on childcare or other caring arrangements (41%), impact on mental or physical health (13%) and impact on work-life balance (43%).

Some 192 respondents were primary caregivers, who would find it difficult or impossible to attend EOH courts. The WICL report concludes ‘the vast majority of criminal practitioners have no more hours left to give’.

Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll