header-logo header-logo

09 September 2010 / Andrew Parker
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

No time for hesitation

Jackson: the case for reform remains strong...

Jackson: the case for reform remains strong. Andrew Parker explains why

It is now nearly nine months since the master of the rolls, Lord Neuberger, declared at the launch of Lord Justice Jackson’s final report, that the “time for discussion and debate is over”. That certainly did not stop the debate, but has the report had the desired impact?

In terms of the need for reform of civil litigation costs, nothing has changed. High success fees and high after the event (ATE) insurance premiums, often equalling or exceeding the amount in dispute, still abound.  Conditional fee agreements are still “the major contributor to disproportionate costs in civil litigation in England & Wales” (Jackson LJ’s final report p xvi).

The case for fixed costs on all fast track cases remains as powerful now as it was when Lord Woolf first proposed the concept in 1995.  The introduction of the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) process for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents has applied

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll