header-logo header-logo

09 September 2010 / Andrew Parker
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

No time for hesitation

Jackson: the case for reform remains strong...

Jackson: the case for reform remains strong. Andrew Parker explains why

It is now nearly nine months since the master of the rolls, Lord Neuberger, declared at the launch of Lord Justice Jackson’s final report, that the “time for discussion and debate is over”. That certainly did not stop the debate, but has the report had the desired impact?

In terms of the need for reform of civil litigation costs, nothing has changed. High success fees and high after the event (ATE) insurance premiums, often equalling or exceeding the amount in dispute, still abound.  Conditional fee agreements are still “the major contributor to disproportionate costs in civil litigation in England & Wales” (Jackson LJ’s final report p xvi).

The case for fixed costs on all fast track cases remains as powerful now as it was when Lord Woolf first proposed the concept in 1995.  The introduction of the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) process for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents has applied

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll