header-logo header-logo

15 October 2009 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

No strings attached?

What happens to lease renewal when the landlord is in administration? Malcolm Dowden reports

In Somerfield v Spring [2009] EWHC 2384 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 68 (Oct) the landlord went into administration after serving a counter notice opposing renewal of the tenant’s lease on redevelopment grounds. The landlord’s administrator sought to defer the tenant’s application for a new tenancy until it could put together a scheme of redevelopment that would satisfy Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954), s 30(1)(f).

It was common ground that a landlord cannot normally defer a tenant’s application where it has no current and credible scheme for redevelopment.

However, the administrator sought to buy time by relying on the moratorium imposed by Insolvency Act 1986 that “no legal process...may be instituted or continued against the company or property of the company except with the: (a) consent of the administrator, or (b) permission of the court”.

The tenant applied to the court for permission to pursue its proceedings. In determining the tenant’s application, the court had to balance the statutory objectives of administration against the crucial issue under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll