header-logo header-logo

05 February 2010 / David Hewitt
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

No place like home?

Since last April many hospitals and care homes have had the power to deprive people of their liberty.

Since last April many hospitals and care homes have had the power to deprive people of their liberty. This is the result of the DoLS—the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

The government prefers to see the DoLS as protection: a way of preventing the arbitrary detention of the old and the incapable. It is certainly true that the DoLS were introduced to fill a gap in the law; a gap rather embarrassingly revealed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the 2004 case of Bournewood v United Kingdom [2004] All ER (D) 39 (Oct). Presumably, therefore, it would be a cause for concern if the new safeguards were not being used.

The government forecast that before the spring, around 21,000 people would have their cases assessed under the DoLS and a quarter of them would then be brought formally within the safeguards. According to the latest statistics, that is simply not going to happen.

l Of the more-than-300 local authorities and Primary Care Trusts charged

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll