header-logo header-logo

02 March 2012 / Phillip Morgan
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Opinion , Media
printer mail-detail

No place to hide?

Phillip Morgan reports on striking a balance between law, tactics & the media

Lawyers and insurers often think with blinkers, unaware of how their actions will be portrayed by the press. A good tactical decision in litigation can be a major public relations disaster. All major concerns should take care over their media profile. The media controls public perceptions, it is a tool used by pressure groups, campaigners, marketers, and politicians alike to exert influence and to weaken their opponents by ensuring that it is their message that dominates. The importance of influence and the media is now a significant consideration in any military campaign. In making litigation decisions, lawyers should consider the media coverage of their course of conduct and its impact on their client. Where possible, they should ensure that their conduct of the case, when reported by the media, is not open to manipulation by opponents, or portrayed in a significantly negative fashion.

A case in point

The media coverage of JGE v The Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2011] EWHC 2871 (QB), [2012] 1 All

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll