header-logo header-logo

No need for new terror scrutiny board

05 February 2015
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Bar Council has taken issue with government proposals to create a UK Privacy and Civil Liberties Board to scrutinise terror legislation.

The proposal for the Board is set out in the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill—a Home Office consultation on the proposal closed last week.

However, Alistair MacDonald QC, Bar chair, points out that there already exists an independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, David Anderson QC, whose job is to scrutinise terror laws in light of civil liberties and privacy concerns. He says removing restrictions on Anderson so he could review all relevant terror laws would be cheaper than creating a new Board, which would cost an estimated £800,000 to run per year.says

MacDonald argues that setting up an additional board would “generate confusion and undermine rather than reinforce public understanding of the process”.

Issue: 7639 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll