header-logo header-logo

28 January 2022 / John Gould
Issue: 7964 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

No Minister

69739
Misbehaviour in public office: John Gould examines the limitations of the Ministerial Code

Whenever a government minister is in trouble for misbehaving—which, let’s face it, is pretty often these days—much reference is made to the Ministerial Code. It is presented as the weight against which the potential sinner will be weighed in the balance and, if found wanting, the writing will be on the wall for their ministerial career. From the way it is presented, one might think that it was right up there with Magna Carta, the Napoleonic Code or the Riot Act made in the first year of the reign of King George. According to the BBC, if a minister breaches the code, they are expected to resign whatever the breach.

Precious principles

While it may be reassuring to think that ministers have to observe a code which operates in the same way as the codes and rules applying to professionals like doctors and lawyers, it is not actually so. In a regulatory sense, the code does not, in fact, contain many rules at all.

Ministers of the Crown

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll