header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011 / Henry Marshall
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

No love lost?

Henry Marshall presents ”The Edge of Love”, starring Capitol Films & the Insolvency Act 1986

The High Court has ruled that the joint administrators of Capitol Films Limited must bear significant legal costs personally, after their application for permission to sell assets of the stricken film producer and distributor was dismissed (Re Capitol Films Ltd (in administration) [2010] EWHC 3223 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 175 (Dec)).

The case provides an interesting contrast to recent cases in which challenges to the conduct of an administrator have failed, such as Four Private Investment Funds v Lomas and Others [2008] EWHC 2869 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 237 (Nov) (in which an application under para 74 of Sch B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 challenging the administrator’s failure to provide the information sought by creditors failed) and BLV Realty Organization Limited v the Joint Administrators of Zegna III Holdings Inc [2009] EWHC 2994 (Ch) (in which the court declined to intervene with the administrators’ commercial judgment to terminate a contract). The above cases illustrate that in practice the court will intervene in the course of an administration

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll