header-logo header-logo

23 July 2014
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No hero

The justice secretary’s “Heroism Bill” has come under fire from both sides of the House during its second reading.

The Social Action, Responsibility and Heroism Bill, (SARAH) requires courts to take the context into account when deciding negligence claims, for example, was there an emergency or was the defendant trying to do a good deed? However, some of its critics say it does nothing to change the law and is therefore a waste of Parliamentary time. Others, including the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, say it encourages recklessness.

During the debate, Conservative MP Edward Garnier, a former solicitor general, predicted the Bill would become “the object of derision and ridicule”.

Shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan described SARAH as “embarrassing and pathetic”.

Issue: 7616 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

NEWS
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE
The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition
back-to-top-scroll