header-logo header-logo

19 May 2017 / Warren Wooldridge
Issue: 7746 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

No half measures

nlj_7746_woolridge

Agile working requires a real culture change, says Warren Wooldridge

The concept of agile working is fast defining the next generation of law firms that threaten to bloody the nose of the traditional status quo. Being able to work where, when and how you want is of course only one element that differentiates the new from the old but interestingly it is the one that traditional law firms have deemed the easiest to defend. By somehow portraying themselves as supporters of agile working it is hoped they will blunt one of the key advantages enjoyed by newer law firm models.

Paying lip service

Paying lip service to existing staff and allowing them to work the occasional day from home or by knocking down the partitioning walls to create an open plan office is missing the point. True agile working is a real cultural change. Allowing lawyers to work in this way from day one has some serious benefits. There is no stigma attached to working from home. There is no feeling of somehow missing out on the office dynamic.

It is not just about a better

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll