header-logo header-logo

Civil justice: no going back?

49424
Where now for the civil justice system post-COVID, asks Shirley Denyer
  • Service of documents including proceedings.
  • Remote hearings and e-documents.

As anyone involved in civil justice will know, the COVID-19 crisis has resulted in a transformation of the system. With the judiciary, legal representatives and parties confined to their homes, and attendance at court rendered impossible, the court service rose to the occasion to maintain access to justice.

Changes to the system impossible to imagine in February 2020 have become the norm. Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) members recognise fully the enormous pressure the crisis placed on the court service and are very appreciative of the hard work and commitment that has been shown to keep the system in operation.

With the vaccine programme now well underway in the UK, with some hope of normality returning, attention is turning to the longer-term implications of the pandemic on court reform. In effect, COVID has been the catalyst for the biggest pilot scheme ever experienced in the court service and it is right to now use that experience in considering

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll