header-logo header-logo

17 March 2011 / Jonathan De Rohan
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

No fighting back?

Are mesothelioma claims a lost cause for defendants? Jonathan de Rohan reports

Although mesothelioma is almost always caused by the inhalation of asbestos fibres there is a possibility that some cases are “idiopathic”, ie attributable to an unknown cause. Further, a significant proportion of those who contract mesothelioma have no record of occupational exposure to asbestos. The likelihood is that in their cases the disease results from the inhalation of asbestos dust in the atmosphere. The condition may be caused by the inhalation of a single fibre, a few fibres or many fibres, but the more fibres that are inhaled, the greater the risk of contracting it. Like lung cancer, it is an indivisible condition in that, once initiated, further exposure to asbestos fibres will have no causative effect. It is invariably fatal.

Rock of uncertainty

The present state of medical knowledge is such that there is no way of identifying, even on the balance of probabilities, the source of the fibre or fibres which caused a victim’s malignant tumour. This scientific ignorance posed profound obstacles for a victim who was exposed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll