header-logo header-logo

09 June 2021
Issue: 7936 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

No-fault divorce reforms off the table for 2021

Lawyers have expressed dismay at ministers’ decision to delay divorce reforms for six months while it grapples with issues regarding technology, legal, and court procedures.

Justice minister Chris Philp confirmed by way of a parliamentary question this week that implementation of no-fault divorce reforms under the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 will now take place on 6 April 2022. According to Philp, the Family Procedure Rule Committee is still finalising rule changes, and ministry officials are working on amendments to court forms and the online digital divorce service.

‘Following detailed design work, it is now clear that these amendments, along with the full and rigorous testing of the new system ahead of implementation, will not conclude before the end of the year,’ he said.

Neil Russell, partner at Seddons, described the delay as ‘hugely disappointing.

‘Bearing in mind that the last set of [Office for National Statistics] divorce statistics revealed that unreasonable behaviour remains the most common reason for divorce, cited by 49% of wives and 35% of husbands, the blame game needs to end sooner rather than later’.

Emily Foy, senior associate at Payne Hicks Beach, said: ‘HM Courts and Tribunal Service has been working on the online platform for some time, which is already up and running for the current divorce process.

‘It is frustrating that the modifications to the system have not been expedited for this reform. I am aware of a number of couples who have agreed to wait until the autumn to formalise their separation, allowing them to divorce consensually, whose plans have now been thwarted.’

Roopa Ahluwalia, partner at BDB Pitmans, said the delay was disappointing but not surprising: ‘The court system that manages the logistics of all divorces has been underfunded for a number of years and the impact of the pandemic with remote working and hearings has seen it truly creaking.’

Issue: 7936 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll