header-logo header-logo

03 July 2009 / Carol Storer
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

No fat left to chew

Raw economics, not lack of dedication, will force lawyers to consider their commitment to legal aid,
says Carol Storer

This year the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) celebrates its silver jubilee. It might have been hoped that we would have disbanded by now. Twenty five years ago, when the Memorandum of Association was drafted, who would have thought that advancing and improving the provision of legal aid in England and Wales and the remuneration of legal aid practitioners would have needed so much time spent on it?

It seems to us that this summer and autumn are a watershed for practitioners. In the past, practitioners have continued because of their dedication to asserting and enforcing their clients’ rights and their belief in the importance of delivering legal aid work to clients who are often socially disadvantaged. Now, margins have been cut and bureaucracy continues to take up valuable time which could otherwise be used to deliver services. Management of contracts is always more time consuming when the profit margins are low and senior staff have to work out how to deliver a service

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll