header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

‘No deal’ Brexit beckons

nlj_7799_news2_

Uncertainty abounds as Britain approaches EU exit deadline

Businesses are stepping up their contingency plans for a disorderly Brexit as key points remain unresolved two years after the EU Referendum, lawyers say.

The beleaguered EU Withdrawal Act gained Royal Assent this week, but the government has still not published its eagerly-anticipated White Paper on Brexit, and lawyers remain concerned about the lack of progress ahead of the UK’s exit on 29 March 2019.

Charles Brasted, partner in the Hogan Lovells Brexit Taskforce, said: ‘We are already seeing clients accelerate their own contingency plans, including for the possibility of a disorderly exit with no withdrawal agreement in place. Although 80% of the Withdrawal Agreement has been agreed, crucial aspects are unagreed and there will be no agreement unless it can all be resolved.’

Brasted said businesses in a whole range of sectors are hoping for ‘detailed and precise explanation of the government’s plans’ in the White Paper.

‘Both the UK and the EU are still aiming to agree the Withdrawal Agreement and a political declaration on the framework of the future relationship by October this year,’ he said. 

‘However, if significant progress is not made over the summer, this target may need to be revised. Some already believe agreement is not likely until late 2018 or even early 2019. The message from business continues to be “plan for the worst, hope for the best”. The focus on the former is certainly growing by the day.’

Writing in NLJ this week, David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and senior partner at Edwin Coe, said: ‘Industry clients and, now, law firms are planning for the worst, a crash out in nine months, with Airbus and BMW the latest to plead for early certainty. Other than a broad optimism that everyone will see sense, there is little on the horizon that suggests that a crash out is not a distinct possibility’.

Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll