header-logo header-logo

22 January 2020
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

No conflict here

Lawyers have been given the green light to act for both parties when drafting consensual family court judgments

Mr Justice Mostyn held, in JK v MK [2020] EWFC 2, this week, that there was no conflict of interest in jointly drafting consent orders.

According to the International Family Law Group, which represented online services provider amicable in the case pro bono, couples often seek help jointly when they have reached an agreement and want it reflected in court orders. Partner David Hodson said it was ‘frustrating’ for couples, having reached agreement, ‘then to be told they must each instruct a separate lawyer… Many can’t afford it’.

The decision also confirms that this work is not solely restricted to solicitors, and online service providers can draft family court orders using computer-based processes.

Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll