header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Warrantless entry & other police powers in the Criminal Justice Bill

161579
The Criminal Justice Bill expands police powers against citizens in some worrying ways, according to Neil Parpworth of Leicester De Montfort Law School, in this week’s NLJ

Parpworth covers, in particular, clause 22 (seizing of bladed articles and suspected stolen goods) and clause 24 (warrantless entry and search). He explores whether the powers within the clauses could be misused and whether sufficient safeguards exist.

He writes: ‘The language the Bill uses in clauses 22 and 24 reflects familiar concepts and terminology in existing police powers. Nevertheless, what is being proposed amounts to a significant extension of such powers in the contexts of knife and acquisitive crime.’

The Bill is currently on its way through the House of Commons. Parpworth looks at the potential implications of these and some other clauses and at commentary thus far during parliamentary debates.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll