header-logo header-logo

23 June 2023
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Judicial review , Property
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Trespass or frustrated eviction? Prosecutors dig deep for the answer

127497
The construction of HS2 has provided work for criminal lawyers as well as construction engineers, writes NLJ columnist David Walbank KC, of Red Lion Chambers, in this week’s ‘Crime Brief’. Walbank looks at the recent case concerning protestors who tunnelled beneath Euston Square Gardens in central London.

Walbank writes: ‘The operation to evict them involved the full panoply of specialist teams and emergency services and, after an elaborate game of cat and mouse, it was another month before the site was cleared, at a cost of more than £4m.’

But was there a criminal case to answer? The prosecution, after failing to find success, applied for judicial review. The case raised several interesting questions—find the answers in the latest Crime Brief here.

Issue: 8030 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Judicial review , Property
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll