header-logo header-logo

12 January 2024
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The rise of shareholder activism & the ‘shaky’ shareholder principle

152799
The basis of the shareholder principle is ‘shaky’, according to the recent High Court case of Various claimants v G4S

In this week’s NLJ, Lois Horne, disputes partner at Mcfarlanes and a London Solicitor Litigation Association (LSLA) Committee Member, takes a detailed look at the G4S judgment. She explains the practical importance of the principle, given the rise of shareholder activism and shareholder claims, and why there are doubts about its basis and scope.

The shareholder principle, as Horne explains, is ‘the principle that a company cannot assert privilege against its shareholders, except where the documents came into existence in contemplation of proceedings between the company and its shareholders’.

Horne notes the judge in G4S ‘was clearly struck by the absence of detailed consideration of the shareholder principle in previous cases’. However, some may also argue the principle is long-established. Horne highlights that practical difficulties may result and that the current rules are ‘problematic’.

Issue: 8054 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll