header-logo header-logo

03 May 2024
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Artificial intelligence , Technology , Bias , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The relentless creep of algorithmic discrimination

169508

Algorithmic discrimination is on the rise and it’s a serious problem, writes Dr Sebastian Smart in this week’s NLJ. It’s a fascinating insight into a global phenomenon

Smart argues that we need to work towards cross-jurisdictional solutions such as universally accepted definitions and frameworks.

Smart, a research fellow at Anglia Ruskin University’s Centre for Access to Justice and Inclusion, explains how algorithmic discrimination can occur, what damage it can cause, and how different jurisdictions across the world have widely differing approaches to regulation.

He notes that the ‘Post Office Horizon scandal has highlighted the extensive damage that can occur when technology is misapplied’. Yet ‘cases of bias and disparity arising from algorithmic decision-making’ are increasingly frequent. Smart writes: ‘These processes often rely on complex algorithms found in systems that impact aspects of our lives, ranging from social media algorithms to credit scoring methods, job recruitment procedures and even law enforcement practices.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll