header-logo header-logo

28 July 2023
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Child law
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The IICSA recommendations—what now?

132285
In this week’s NLJ, Maryam Syed, criminal and family barrister at 7BR, discusses the path forward for those who feel let down by the government’s response to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA).

The IICSA, set up in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal, was an enormous seven-year operation which took nearly three million pages of evidence and attempted to give voice to victims and survivors of child sexual abuse and which, as Syed writes, ‘made plain that the extent of such abuse was unquantifiable due to the complete lack of unified and coherent data’.

Syed, who has specialised in child sexual abuse for more than 20 years and has sat as a part-time Crown Court judge since 2012, covers the IICSA’s recommendations, the government’s response and the criticism of this response. She looks ahead at what can be done now, and what action a future government might be asked to take—read more here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll