header-logo header-logo

13 November 2020
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Ten years of philosophical belief

31632
What is the meaning of ‘philosophical belief’ for the purposes of employment law?

Pacifism, ethical veganism, democratic socialism, spiritualism and belief in life after have all been considered by the courts in this context in the past ten years. It’s a fascinating area of the law.

However, the criteria set a decade ago by Mr Justice Burton―in the 2010 case brought by the so-called Oxford Green Warrior (Grainger plc v Nicholson)―have stood the test of time.

Writing in NLJ this week, John Bowers QC, Principal of Brasenose College, Oxford, who acted in Grainger, looks at the parameters of philosophical belief, and the development of the law since this seminal case.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll