header-logo header-logo

28 April 2023
Issue: 8022 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Regulators circling as litigation funders celebrate success

120679
Litigation funders have enjoyed a relatively easy regulatory ride so far, but are the good times coming to an end? 

David Greene, NLJ columnist and senior partner at Edwin Coe, writes in this week’s issue that ‘litigation funding is coming under ever closer scrutiny—derived perhaps from its success—and faces challenges in its structure and workings that will cause changes and, perhaps for some less robust funds, demise’.

Looking into the implications of this, Greene notes that the Post Office sub-postmasters’ litigation ‘would not have seen the light of day—at least in the dramatic way it did—but for the funding from litigation finance provider Therium’.

He also covers the Voss Report in Germany, the approach the authorities take to the regulation of litigation funding in other jurisdictions such as Australia and Ireland, and the approach likely to be taken in the UK. 

Read Green's full comment piece here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll