header-logo header-logo

02 September 2022
Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Reform in order to preserve

92254
Remember the Sewel Convention (that Westminster will not legislate on devolved matters without the consent of the relevant Parliament, Senedd or Assembly)? In this week’s NLJ, columnist Roger Smith argues that it’s time to give Sewel ‘some teeth’

This will help preserve the collective of nations that is the UK. Smith writes: ‘Let there be no ways in which the national government can interfere in devolved matters under the control of the devolved governments. After all, you either have the confidence to devolve or you don’t.’

One sticking point is the doctrine of the sovereignty of the UK Parliament. ‘No UK Parliament can bind its successor. So, any constitutional settlement is beset by inherent uncertainty,’ he writes.

Smith weighs up the obstacles and political sensitivities, concluding in favour of reform.

Issue: 7992 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll