header-logo header-logo

17 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Rule of law , Human rights , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Raab and the battle to preserve the rule of law

111200
Is the rule of law safe in the Lord Chancellor, Dominic Raab’s hands? In his column for this week’s NLJ, David Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe, investigates the answer to this question.

It has declined swiftly in Poland and Hungary, Greene notes, so could the same happen here? Greene discusses the government’s behaviour when met with challenges to its plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, as well as the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill.

Then there is Raab’s Bill of Rights. Greene writes that, while the Bill stops short of proposing the UK leave the European Convention on Human Rights, the government appears to be ‘scrapping for a fight to justify departure. That would be an extraordinary and retrograde step on many levels’.

See the full opinion piece here.

Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Rule of law , Human rights , Profession
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll