header-logo header-logo

10 May 2024
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Damages , EU
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Product liability, WAMCA & Dutch legal innovation

171879

A recent Dutch ruling could have potential impact for product liability lawyers in the UK, write Sarah Moore, partner, and Lily Parmar, paralegal, Leigh Day, in this week’s NLJ

In February 2024, an Amsterdam court certified the first ‘opt out’ product liability group action anywhere in Europe. The case concerns textured breast implants and is brought on behalf of about 60,000 women. The relevant legislation is the Dutch Act on Collective Damages Claims (WAMCA).

Could the UK Law Commissions follow the Netherlands’ lead? Moore and Parmar look into the case, the legislation and the scope for similar action in the UK. They write: ‘There can be little doubt that in order to facilitate real access to justice, in the context of product liability claims and beyond, claimant lawyers need access to the type of collective/group actions that are now available in the Netherlands through procedural innovations such as WAMCA.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll