header-logo header-logo

12 July 2024
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Fraud , International
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Problem-solving on disclosure in international fraud

181424

Jurisdictional obstacles can be tricky to overcome, but the English courts are taking a pragmatic approach when it comes to third-party disclosure in international fraud cases, Christian Tuddenham and Tracey Lattimer write in this week’s NLJ

Tuddenham, partner, and Lattimer, senior associate, Jenner & Block, look in particular at the recent case of Tonstate Group Ltd (in liquidation) & Ors v Edward Wojakovski & Ors [2024] EWHC 1196 (Ch), [2024] All ER (D) 87 (May), in which the claimants sought to recover £13.5m company funds illegitimately extracted. To this end, they needed to establish jurisdiction in order to force disclosure of relevant documents, as the producer of the documents resided abroad.

The authors explain how this was achieved. They write: ‘The decision illustrates the willingness of the English courts to adopt a pragmatic approach to potential jurisdictional obstacles where justice requires.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll