header-logo header-logo

31 March 2023
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Probate—how creative practitioners can avoid it

117260
The process of obtaining probate can be a headache and a cause for despair, but what if there were an alternative? 

Ann Stanyer, partner at Wedlake Bell, writing in this week’s NLJ, suggests it may be ‘time to rethink’ whether a grant of representation is necessary and whether, instead, clients’ affairs could be structured in a way to avoid the probate process.

Stanyer sets out alternatives—for example, most high street banks are prepared to release up to £50,000 or more in some circumstances, without a grant of representation. She also looks at trusts and transfers of estate for high net worth individuals.

Stanyer concludes that while, the need for the grant will continue for complex estates, ‘practitioners need to be more creative in advising clients about how to avoid the need for a grant of representation for a straightforward estate’. 

Read more about the alternative options here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll