header-logo header-logo

14 October 2022
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: On the road with Gold

It’s rough justice for road traffic claimants under the protocol, writes former district judge Stephen Gold in this week’s 'Civil Way'.

‘I know because Jackson LJ told us so… and he knows because he effectively designed it and I witnessed it myself once or twice (but not when I was sitting, of course),’ he writes. Gold illustrates his point with a case of two taxi drivers.

Gold also covers ‘failure to remove’ claims against social services, referring to two recent cases. He reminds lawyers that ‘claimants must identify for what it is alleged the defendant has assumed responsibility, the facts relied on as establishing the assumption of responsibility and the dates the alleged duty arose and, if relevant, the periods during which it was owed’.

Finally, Gold takes a look at the rapidly developing evolving (due to U-turns and interest rate hikes) fields of capital gain tax and Court Funds Office’s rates.

See this week's 'Civil Way' here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll