header-logo header-logo

19 July 2024
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Mercer & the politics of the public inquiry

182204
The worlds of law and politics collide where public inquiries take place

In this week’s NLJ, Nick Wrightson, partner, Kingsley Napley, looks at the legal powers to compel witnesses—and the political realities that surround their use.

Wrightson looks at issues relating to former minister of state for veterans’ affairs Johnny Mercer, who gave evidence to the Independent Inquiry relating to Afghanistan, in which he referred to information received in confidence.

The author also refers to issues surrounding the Covid-19 inquiry, in this topical article. He writes: ‘As public inquiries continue to proliferate, we can expect those conducting them to face more dilemmas over when to compel and when to look for another way to achieve what is required.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll